Site icon HPO Center

High Performing Culture allows mistakes

High Performing Culture allows mistakeseen mix van Belbin’s teamrollen, De Caluwé's kleurenmodel en de Waal’s HPO-raamwerk

Allowing mistakes is defined as ‘permitting a person to do things incorrectly or make errors of judgment without consequences.’ Research shows that people in a High Performing Culture learn more effectively from their mistakes than from their successes and that knowledge from mistakes depreciates more slowly than knowledge from success. However, in general, people have difficulty owning up to a mistake and this is all the more true the higher up the organizational ladder. It seems that especially managers are afraid to set the right example by openly admitting they did something wrong or something went awry. Managers in a High Performing Culture therefore actively promote undertaking experiments and learning from mistakes. They permit employees to take risks, are willing to take risks themselves, and convey that mistakes are an opportunity to learn. Managers in a High Performing Culture have a tolerance for failure and setbacks, they don’t play the blame game, the focus is on remedying and improving. People do not need to cover up their mistakes but can openly discuss these and subsequently learn from them.

Messengers of bad news are not punished for bringing the news, they are actually rewarded for their courage, while people who hide their mistakes are reprimanded. In a High Performing Culture nobody cares about why a mistake was made but about how it is going to be fixed and what can be learned from it. There is however in a High Performing Culture one type of mistake which is never allowed: the same! People working in a High Performing Culture also know that if they never make a mistake, they are probably playing it too safe and are therefore not innovative enough.

Download chapter 1 and 2 of What Makes a High Performance Organization for free (PDF)

Our chief executive officer says it all the time: do your thing and if this thing eventually has to be changed or adjusted we will let you know, but start doing it anyway. People always have a bit of fear taking charge in this manner, they always want to do the right thing. Clearly some mistakes are harmful. In a highly regulated industry we have to draw the lines. We encourage being accountable, from making decisions when they’re needed to calling out incongruent behavior when you see it. At the end of the day, it’s about being engaged.

IDEAS TO GET STARTED TO CREATE A HIGH PERFORMING CULTURE FOR ALLOWING MISTAKES

You can build a High Performing Culture (psychologically safe environment for employees) to make mistakes in the following ways:

Is the culture within your organization a High Performing Culture? Our HPO-diagnosis will give you more insight!

For more information about creating a High Performing Culture, the HPO Framework, HPO Diagnosis, our lecturers, HPO Experts, workshops and Master Classes, please contact us (schreurs@hpocenter.com).

We give people so much responsibility early on in their career that mistakes are bound to be made, you just expect them so that is not such a big deal. Making the same mistake twice, that is really not done because then you show that you haven’t learned from the first time around. Tolerance for the same mistakes is just plain low here.

— Lennard Boogaard, Unilever

We are the world’s greatest bank, not the world’s most perfect bank. Mistakes are going to be made, they just are. But it is a matter of how empowered one is: Is someone allowed to fix a problem at all cost, especially when it happened several times, and you’re going to lose customers if you can’t fix it at the end of the day? The important thing is that we talk about the opportunity around a mistake or a customer issue. There is more opportunity in issues than in the day-to-day transactions and being nice and giving service. If you are empowered to turn a bad situation into a good one, our frontline people will say: “I am going to see what I can do here” and they go to the ends of the earth. They are not always going to be successful with everyone, certainly, but they convey to customers that they try as hard as possible. We learned a lot from the Ritz-Carlton. A lot of their teachings say that it is not only about making the stay at their hotel really great and continuously surprising and delighting their guests, but about handling a complaint in such a way that guests are going to tell 20 friends: “Go over there and let them make a mistake because what they do to fix it is great.

A High Performing Culture doesn’t mean you don’t make mistakes! If we make one, we will genuinely own up to it and that is much appreciated by the customer. If something goes wrong and you are able to be open about it and fix it quickly and afterwards make sure you solve the root cause of the mistake, you will get many compliments from your customer. Perhaps the most difficult display of behavior to overcome in an organization and in the relation with partners and customers is the blame culture that kicks in the minute something goes wrong. We, from our very inception, have addressed the ‘finger pointing’ issue by taking 100 percent responsibility for the availability of mission critical applications at the customer. Our company culture and natural attitude is to first solve an issue with all means possible and only afterwards, through fact based analysis, find the root cause and plan and execute fixing the problem structurally. Adopting this mindset frees up time and energy – which otherwise would be devoted to figuring out who is at fault or who is to blame – to productively diagnosing and solving problems. Consequently, a High Performing Culture that avoids finger pointing also prevents partners from defensively withholding information from each other. Information that may be important to their mutual and customers’ success but which is not shared for fear that it might be used as evidence of incompetence or poor performance. Based on our collaborative attitude, behavior and High Performing Culture we are capable of building high-trust relationships with all parties involved.

— Pim Berger & Ilja Heitlager, Schuberg Philis

Exit mobile version